M

Archive for 2010|Yearly archive page

Music isn’t just for musicians. (Duh.)

In music-esque, My Work on December 23, 2010 at 11:03 am

There is a common clarification that I have to make when I speak with others about my ideas about music knowledge: when I talk about music knowledge, it goes beyond music as a sound-based product, I am talking about all the other non-musical elements that go around that product. (The idea of music as a ‘product’ doesn’t work for me… so much music around the world exists outside of the desire to be commercialized, but that’s perhaps another rant for another post.)

One of the problems that the field of Music Information Retrieval tries to address is music recommendation. Much of the technology draws from techniques developed in textual information retrieval systems, while treating the ‘document’ as the encoded sound itself. While the technology for audio recognition is being developed (speech, music, noise, etc.), MIR research relies heavily on human tagging to generate music recommendations and genre-based classifications.

What is entirely missing to me is, well, everything else. The research is necessarily focused and narrow, but if you conceive the full spectrum of music as it manifests throughout history and across the globe, the “music as product” concept applies to mostly the international economic model of music. This model drives research into developing more nuanced genres in more popular types of music, and more token acknowledgement of less popular genres that still have substantial market share.

Amidst all this, what is obviously missing to me are the broader music information behaviour of individuals beyond the desire to find music. Consumers of popular music don’t just consume the song, they consume the culture, the history, the fan base, a whole ecology of information and resources that they have an interest in. It’s a wicked problem, at a broad conceptual level, and even in traditional settings such as music libraries, or novel knoweldge exchange platforms that facilitates “direct collaboration rather than a series of directed monologues acting as a makeshift conversation”.

The conceptual picture is coming together for me, now it’s time to scale back and look at what the milestones needs to me. Systems are not built on an idea after all, time to take it back to the “line by line” level.

But first: lots of sleep and relaxation!

December: Progress Update

In My Work on December 1, 2010 at 12:27 am

As I approach the completion of my degree’s course requirements, and realize that I have survived an incredibly ambitious semester (some would say “year”), I am taking the time to give myself a nice pat on the back, and not feel guilty about taking it easy for a little while. Having received my ethics approval just last Friday, I slept and lounged extra well this weekend. I will be recruiting for subjects within the next week, so keep an eye out. I am looking forward to having some quiet time to engage in data collection for my thesis this month and continue my lit review over the holiday. Dan Perkel’s research in particular has lead me to a body of research that affords me the vocabulary I need to articulate my ideas. I am looking forward to some serious reading, writing and thinking time.

I am also taking the opportunity to follow up on old leads, one of which was Prof. Gerald Penn’s invitation last year to speak to his lab a bit about my research. He was one of the guest speakers at the recent KMDI Industry Roundtable event which I helped organize and facilitated (along with guests Jon Crowley, Andrew Lovett-Baron and Prof. Chris Collins), and we finally arranged for a lab visit this week. Gerald runs a very interesting lab doing incredible things with text summarization vis-à-vis natural language processing. With an interdisciplinary background himself in the humanities, I am very much looking forward to having a conversation with the folks there.

Looking ahead, the first half of 2011 is already promising to be conference galore. At least, if I am actually able to attend some of these!

Musicianship as Citizenship: The Shakuhachi Phenomenon

In music-esque, My Work on November 16, 2010 at 10:19 pm


Last Monday, I was very excited about Kiku’s arrival from Denmark. I had been reviewing the skype interviews she conducted with members of the Shakuhachi Forum, and slowly became acquainted with the emergent phenomenon of an online community of shakuhachi players outside of Japan. To take on the shakuhachi (Japanese flute) as anything more than a hobbyist is a difficult task if you cannot speak Japanese, do not have acccess to a teacher in Japan, or at least one who has studied extensively in Japan. Many who become enamoured with the instrument through zen buddhism, Japanese films, anime and manga do not have ready access to the shakuhachi traditions and practices, and may very well find themselves quite alone in their obsession within their immediate circles. This was true, of course, before the age where personal video conferencing technology such as Skype became relatively accessible and affordable to a significant segment of the world’s population.

The phenomenon of a relatively inaccessible musical tradition to the western world —except the select few who have the means, the time and the drive to pursue such knowledge and practice—becoming more opened as a result of the internet is not unique to Shakuhachi. In fact, it can happen to any system of knowledge and practice that is transmitted orally in a face-to-face and communal context. So why shakuhachi?

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.